Thursday, October 12, 2017

A Bardic Bootbaggerist

Boston's most well known and widely read troll in poesy and America's biggest satirical poetry critic, William Logan, has spent a career in one-sided bare-knuckle bardic bootbaggery; and what the Enniskeen Monaghan poet, Patrick Kavanagh, called in his poem Prelude, 'the unfruitful prayer of satire.'

His once crisp cutting-edge reviews were for many years very funny during the peak of his satirical career, but his writing star in the online age has dulled and ended with no place to evolve, his satirical tank has hit empty, the one trick shtick's washed up, and he knows now he is a fraud in Filiócht.

He is a laughably transparent critical hypocrite. When reviewing the Dennis O'Driscoll Stepping Stones interviews, and Heaney generally, he deploys the word 'cunning' a lot with a pejorative bias, stating parenthetically of the infinitely more eloquent, humanly warm, humble and talented Irish ollamh:

"The slyest moments here are his backhanded judgments on fellow poets."

...before indulging in the exact same practice:

"The richness of these interviews comes in part from the weakness of character inadvertently revealed. A poetry of warmth and humility has been drawn around a personality at times icy with conceit."

The obvious statement to make about Logan's style is that he has made a name for himself as a head-stomper, applying the sneeriest of standards to others, when his own poetry is a weak gruel fare and of a laughably poorer quality than most of the people's he trolls.

Henry Lloyd Moon, an anonymous critic responding on the Guardian Books Blog in 2009 to a worshipful blurb by John Sutherland toadying up to Martin Amis - could equally be referring to Logan's overblown poetic standing when s/he writes of Amis:

"It's like laughing along with the worldly but weedy class show-off."

Poet-manque Logan is clearly more of an aging comedian past his best than a literary valuable critic professing praiseful prayerfully and with a sense of reverence for the art and objects in language that make a poem sing in the aural ear of everyone regardless of our education or standing, and is merely an outrageously readable professional and increasingly bitter has-been troll, among whose many glaring faults is one that anyone tutored by the people of the goddess Art can spot.

That for all his material comfort, this envy-driven drek-specialist is essentially unfulfilled in the role of poet, because these days virtually no Joy ever dribbles from his mental lips onto the review page. He has written far too much satire, like a pub bore whinging in the corner alone because their life-long lists of what is wrong and not working and what is rubbish and what is unworthy of the senior critical misanthrope's attention and time, are way too depressing and spiritually toxic for the junior alcoholics to stomach.

The one or two that can barely tolerate the toxic spewking are usually equally senior literary haters and intellectual failures rejecting any form of simple positive literary language of broad inclusion, and, too satirically trapped and unable to free their minds from the chains of mental slavery to their own fragile egos incapable of facing up publicly to their low stations and initiating the sweeping cerebral changes which will reverse the mind's poetic polarity to draw form and make sing the spirit of human happiness, that our vampiric Loganites leach from all around when talking in print their poetically poisonous brand of increasingly unfunnier and unfunnier uncritical lazy polished stand up doggerelist routines.


The simple humble human state of being in awe and wonder with the divine, is something which has totally by-passed this awful doggerelist's plodding ditties, made from the most mediocre low quality psychic head-juice, and composed in an untutored joyless imagination and intellect that is the contemporary poetic equivalent of the lowest first grade 'culbard' (back/rear-bard) of the eight in the ('unfree') Dóer bard caste.

Sixteen bardic levels, eight in the Dóer, and eight in the ('free') Sóer bard class; that this dinosaur native of Boston Clowntalkin wud defecate his critical trews if presented with by someone possessing authentic knowledge of Filiocht, who came to expose his own doggerelistic practice by attempting to instigate a Bardic Colloquy with him.

Barely at the bottom, tenth and lowest grade ye start at on the twelve year literary Fili poet curriculum, an ollaire, ('apple'), who needed to have written seven pieces of satirical text to move up to the next grade in their studies; and that one ancient gloss, translated first into German from Gaelic by Ronald Thurneyson in Mittelirische Verslehren, Irish tract on the poetic metres, that present in comprehensive detail the eight grades of the noble sóerbards ('freebards'), describes Logan's art as "the bastard sport of the juggler's apple".

Whilst another ancient Irish literary source labels this lowest grade "fuirseoir gan dán" "a buffoon without skill" in the Liam Breatnach translated (1978) Uraicecht na Ríar/Primer of Stipulations.

A 10C legal text on the status of poets, that includes information on each grade of the ten grades on the 12 year Filí poet course, the  number, type, and form of compositions each had to learn; the names and metres appropriate to each of the sixteen grades of free and unfree bards; as well as the log enech 'face price' of each of the eight grades of free bards and seven literary Filí grades.

Log enech (Welsh equivalent - wynebwerth); was the value put on one's oath and word, and the amount of payment each meter and grade of free bard and literary Filí poet can expect for a text composed in the metres appropriate to their grades; as well as the set damages and compensation they pay out to others if they 'lost face'; or received, when successfully contending a civil injury Brehon law cases, based on their social and literary status.

With the Reader also learning exactly what textual material one must have memorized, written and be proficient in the making of to attain each literary grade and pass onto the next in their studies. And, most importantly of all, the difference between a literary Filí poet and common bard; the highest of which in the free-bard class was the rig-bard grade, with only eight years training.

And which settled recently on Oxford university poet and literary goddess Fiona Sampson's Facebook; a silent stand off between the 'Bob Dylan is a Poet' crowd led by Carcanet hippy Michael Schmidt, and the 'how dare you dare you Bob Dylan is not a poet' crowd; with both sides unable to resolve the question because, it can be argued, in the purest theoretical sense, members on both sides of the debate, by the standards of the Primer of Stipulations, are not poets either, because, according to the authoritative definition on the matter: "Bard d(an)o: cin dligedfogluime is indtleacht fadeisin": "A bard, then: without the prerogative of learning, but intellect alone."

Strictly speaking, from a traditional Irish poetry perspective, unless one has 'the prerogative of learning', has studied and passed the set requirements of the 12 year Irish literary Filí poet curriculum, they were considered a bard not a literary poet; by those Writing Studies graduates that had completed the required twelve to sixteen years of exacting study and graduated to speaking fluently at the very highest of their potential, toxic in satire and splendorous in praise, wrapped in the shield of the eternal ever-loving warm witty kind voice of the people of our earthly island goddess Her.

Another difference also being, we are told by the literary Filí poet: "though the bards are not bound to have a knowledge of letters and syllables they must be able to distinguish and recognise correct consonance by ear and by thought."

Powerful, a handful of words settles it, and there is no disputing from those Oxbreligious ivy leaguers one would expect were able to contend with a werking-klaws dirteh lettle oink spewking with a voice of Lancashababru from Ormskirk bygone times.

Translated by Liam Breatnach, (1987, p98), Uraicecht Na Riar - The Poetic Grades in Early Irish Law. Thus "the essential difference between the Filí and the bard is the latter’s lack of professional training".

Exactly the important point Robert Graves emphasizes in the opening of his first of the 1954/5 Cambridge University Clarke Lectures, with a subject of Professional Standards in English Poetry: The Crowning Privilege:

Unlike stockbrokers, soldiers, sailors, doctors, lawyers, and parsons, English poets do not form a closely integrated guild. A poet may put up his brass plate, so to speak, without the tedious preliminaries of attending a university, reading the required books and satisfying examiners. Also, a poet, being responsible to no General Council, and acknowledging no personal superior, can never be unfrocked, cashiered, disbarred, struck off the register, hammered on 'Change, or flogged round the fleet, if he is judged guilty of unpoetic conduct.
The only limits legally set on his activities are the acts relating to libel, pornography, treason, and the endangerment of public order. And if he earns the scorn of his colleagues, what effective sanctionscan they take against him? None at all. 

Because the poet is a member of what Graves calls an anarchic profession, their responsibility must be to the Muse alone, and because no guild confers a diploma on English language poets, hence, any literary lummox such as Logan can stamp upon the corporate page as a critic-poet when really s/he is more a satirical troll anyone can set ourselves up as even though s/he is merely akin to a second grade taman.

Middle of the three satirical bardic sub-grades on the 12 year Filí literary poet training course, a second year student full of satirical toxicity, and 'taman', the headless ('trunk' 'stock') state of a decapitated body who ‘assaults everyone with his recitations’, ‘does not make the apportioning of the truth’, will ‘oppress the chiefs of the court’, and ‘spew their brute mouthfuls’.

One below a drisiuc (thorn-bard), the name coming from a doérbard' of the third degree, and a low satirist and lampooner, so called thorn because s/he 'sticks in the face of all.'

A trafficker in mockery, as all begin as, satirically sneering at those above us in the tree of literary Filiocht/poetry; and coming to learn how to praise after completing the studies of the early satirical grades. And exiting the drisuic grade--that had to have written a total of 20 pieces--before s/he could start the studies of the first literary beginner's grade, Fochloc, in the third year.

In my third year I was still at the Conceptual and Linguistically Innovative Poetry School, having completed two very joyous straight years Modern American Poetry modules on a Writing Studies BA starting with Pound's A Few Don'ts and working through the American canon and going out the door with the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E poetry taught to us by well known Edge Hill University experimental poet brawlers, Robert Sheppard, and Scott Thurston.

Two greatly feared London avant-garde heavyweights, and veterans of many brutal no holds barred academic straighteners and epistemological dirty fights. Sheppard having gained his reputation as a terrifying intellectual boot-bagger of Movement squares when risking everything at the front line of the Earls Court PoSoc (Poetry Society) Wars, as an underage mercenary who'd fought his way up from the streets as part of an out of control linguistically dangerous cadre of modern American poetry inspired outlaws who launched what Charles Osbourne Director of Literature at the English Arts Council of the time, furiously labeled: "A treacherous assault on British poetry".

By English poets inspired by the American Black Mountain scene, Objectivists, WCW, New York School and the Beat poets, with the fascist tool Pound their intellectual leader. Which now of course is mainstream, but in 1971 this was treason, and the red leftist hippies took over the petty cash tin and drinks budget, and the great flowering of the British Poetry Revival occurred, led by the 1960's and '70s Fagan of London Poetry's Underworld, the DIY ethos, Writers Forum creator, Bob Cobbing.

Commander in Chief of the Rebellion, Eric Mottram, Sheppard's PhD supervisor. Sheppard himself was the very inspiring PhD supervisor of poetry special forces commando Scott Thurston, who when he left Edge Hill's literary SAS training camp muscled in on the toughest patch in England, and carved out his turf in Salford, where he gained his current reputation as our now greatly feared and seldom crossed poetic intellectual hard-man, whose love for the world's most experimental poetries kick-started Manchester's Linguistically Innovative Other Room Scene on the academic cobbles. Pound for pound, one of the toughest most formidably experimental academic avant-garde poetry minds this side of New York.

I first called Logan out years ago, in the genesis of this text that was published in 2009 as a comment on an article written by Don Share, titled I Hate Poetry... Reviews?, published on the Poetry Foundation's Harriet Blog at what is now The Donald's lifeless come all ye bland multicultural Foetry Poundation, when Share was still assistant editor at what was then still Christian Winman's literary showcase for exclusively dead white male Bawsten poetry. Calling out the critical poetry clown and literary liquidation expert when I still had four and five years left to study.

Pointing out that the all American bardic buffoon and modernist spewing his brute mouthful of mass mockery without the prerogative of learning but intellect alone, our third-rate drisiuc thorn-bard that sticks in the face of all, is working with only half the ingredients in the poetry kit-bag, the "Fi" of "toxic in satire", and none of the "Li, splendorous in praise".

Both of which make etymologically up the two halves of a superlative literary Filí poet's tongue, that 'it is various the poet speaks' in, the speckled art of poetry, consisting of two ingredients, Praise and Satire.

Here are a few lines from the resident know all whose mediocrity knows no bounds:

After the Blitz, her mother had begun an affair. So she said.
No one would have called her wellbred,

but she knew how to fill a low-cut dress,
had a fetching smile and a tongue for success.

...and on and on adinfinitum, no half or slant acoustic concordance, and deploying all the plodding amateur rhyming skills and doggerelist intelligence he lambasts the targets of his critical misanthropy for displaying.

I read the Boston spirit strangler's collection of critical carnage and butchery Our Savage Art recently (in 2009, prepping for this inevitable clash), littered with allusions and references to figures from Greek myth, as Logan tried to strike a balance between being bare-knuckle bore and belabouring his points about the fine art of civilised Criticism, seemingly blind to the irony, that most examples of what he is saying about all the poetaster critics of yesteryear - are equally applicable to himself:

"Blackmur, who, though a brilliant critic, was a dreadful poet."

...and quoting Coleridge:

"..a critic most hates those who excel in the particular department in which he, the critic, has notoriously been defeated.."

The problem with aging two-dimensional ditty makers who have little in the way of poetic talent and lots in the way of attitude, who fall into safe comfortable numbers as the jolly pit-bull critic sneering at all and sundry - is that eventually they become spent grumps and are put out of their misery when a funnier smarter kinder and more literary learned wit enters the bardic ring, and, playing them at their own game, knocks them satirically out with the first shlap from the heart and soul of the true people of the goddess Art, and that leaves the outcome in no doubt when bodies forth a voice of filliocht from our only loving earthly son of the sacred heart in heaven, mother be the name, filled without and within, by and from, the eternal faery maternal love all purely Her's.

I have stated before, i am keen to debate Logan, with or without satirical gloves, anywhere online or in print; but i am confident he has not sufficient literary courage to bardically debate because s/he his mind knows one's own is superior in both intellect and artistry than his.

WB Logan is a brutal bardic conman, satirical literary lightweight and Filliocht poetry faker, no more a qualified literary Filí poet than i'm a tree who's a planet or a moon fully Spanish; more, he's a weedy armchair wannabe oi wish Rambo who's gob dribbles pap for the Pop Idol audience and generation of second rate satirical ditty readers.

The Werking Krap in Shwelly Voice by William Logan. Critic manque, forgettable ditty maker.

Be Warned. Ye gorra 'av a laff.


Shahzaib Khan said...

These are very nice collection of poetry. Do you have Urdu Poetry or Hindi Poetry.

Angela Knight said...

Irish poetry has ever been remarkable for its freshness and vitality. Besides providing a great aesthetic experience, Irish poems keep a deep sense of social commitment as well. "A Bardic Bootbaggerist" opens up an array of critical thoughts on the way Irish society operates. Check Custom Essay Writing Service for a in-depth analysis on the satirical element of the poem.

Sean Parker said...

Nice words, thanks for sharing them with us.
meet and greet heathrow terminal 5

Mr Luchador said...

You words hold much weight, thanks for sharing.
meet and greet parking luton

Millie Summer said...

An anonymous critic responding on the Guardian Books Blog in 2009.
meet and greet Heathrow